This engaging volume explores the claim that misanthropy is a justified attitude towards humankind in the light of how human beings both compare with and treat animals. Drawing on both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions David Cooper offers a unique insight into the complex field of animal ethics.

Acknowledgements. 1 Misanthropy; Prologue, Feelings and judgements, Human beings, humankind, human nature. 2 Introducing animals; A false start, Two kinds of reflection, A lesson from David Hume, Human animals? Which animals? 3 Human and animal lives; Differences, Affinities, Scepticism, theory and life. 4 Human failings; Reminders, A charge list, Ubiquity and entrenchment. 5 Animal vices and virtues; Animal vices? Human virtues, Animal virtues, Coda: beauty and virtue. 6 Treatment of animals; ‘Brutality to "brutes"’, Another charge list, Animal suffering and human failings, Conclusion.7 ‘A fundamental debacle’; Agriculture, hubris, technology, A ‘true moral test’, ‘An eternal Treblinka’? 8 Responding to misanthropy; Optimism, Radicalism, Quietism. 9 Being with animals; Rationality, Attunement, Virtues, emulation and mystery. Index

This is a striking and original project with a thought-provoking premise about misanthropy and its justification. Cooper refreshes our notion of what misanthropy is by identifying it, not as a hostile feeling towards other human beings, as traditionally understood, but as a negative moral judgment on humankind, a judgment formed partly out of how we compare with and how we treat animals, and this is the theme of the book. It is not intended as another tour through the routine moral theories highlighting the moral status of animals. No theory is required to see how they should be treated ‘once animals are properly perceived’.Cooper rejects the idea that human beings are merely one animal species amongst others, and his emphasis on the nature of the differences brings into relief his central contention that the bad treatment of animals is to be understood as a ‘moral debacle’ because it is one manifestation of the moral vices that are distinctively human and earn the negative judgment of misanthropy, rather than because it violates animal rights or ignores their moral status. It is interesting that Cooper wants to foreground dogs and horses rather than the apes, though he teasingly leaves this unexplained in his proposal.There is a further distinguishing characteristic of Cooper’s treatment of this issue, viz that it draws freely on Asian and East Asian sources. Those familiar with Cooper’s work will be aware of how much he has contributed to bringing these sources into conversation with western philosophy, offering a new kind of fusion that makes possible a ‘world philosophy’ and this is an important aspect of this short book and should be emphasised in promotion material since there is a growing interest in how Buddhist and other traditions can influence our western philosophical ideas. Michael McGhee, University of Liverpool, UK This is an excellent proposal: the topic is original and important, the structure sensible, the arguments very compelling, the diversity of sources/inspirations both rich and impressive, and it would be importantly and interestingly different from the vast literature on animals – something that stands apart for good reasons.Misanthropy is an excellent theme for reflection on animals, the good life, and the human condition and the claims the author indicates show its richness. Indeed, there’s a good deal of courage in tackling the issue of misanthropy head on in this way—no doubt the uncomfortable character of the issue is one reason why few other authors have addressed it directly.I would predict great interest in it from a wide audience of ethicists, environmental writers and theorists, lovers and scholars of animals, not to mention the various specific fields where human-animal relations are of moral, practical, and personal concern (e.g. agricultural studies, food culture, zoos, and so on). Properly promoted, the audience is enormous—and the author notes that the popular literature on animals, although enormous, tends to be quite ‘samey’, so this book, with its unique theme (misanthropy) and its rich influences (Asian and continental philosophy, animal studies, environmental thought) would be something new and welcome. Ian Kidd, University of Nottingham, UK