Whereas much discourse on the Balkans is from a western perspective, this book looks at the Balkans primarily inside-out, from within the Balkans towards its “self” and the outside world, where the west is important but not sole referent. The book will interest scholars of transnationalism, politics, historical geography, border and area studies.

Acknowledgements Introduction1. A Concept with Many Names2. The Emergence of the Balkans as a Cultural-Historical Space3. The Balkans as Autospace4. The Balkans on the European Map5. Nationalism in Transnational Guise6. In the orbit of Eastern Europe7. A Sonderweg or a Metaphor?ConclusionReferencesIndex

"This long-awaited book is a ground-breaking contribution to Balkan studies and to imagology in general. It constitutes a milestone in the debate on the construction of historical regions and opens a new horizon of interpretation by radically changing the perspective: it focusses on intraregional scholarly concepts of the Balkans, a region constructed by Serbian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Albanian and Greek researchers and research institutions. It elucidates Central and Eastern European scholarship on the region that has achieved, since the second half of the 19th century, important results in fields such as history, philology, linguistics, archaeology and anthropology, and that differs considerably from more politicised and prejudice-ridden discourses in the Anglo-American world… Far from being just a negative prejudice of Western travelogues and journalists, the Balkans emerge [here] as a highly complex cultural construction. Diana Mishkova´s book will thus change our understanding of a crucial debate in cultural studies." -- Oliver Jens Schmitt, Professor of Southeast European History, University of Vienna, and Head of the Department of Balkan Studies, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria"The Balkans are crucial for an understanding of Europe’s 20th century: at the beginning and at the end, the Balkans loom large in European history and provide key caesuras. Anyone wanting to understand ‘Balkanism’ and its manifold meanings over time, and anyone wishing to obtain a deeper understanding of how this region of Europe has been ‘ticking’, will have to read Diana Mishkova’s entirely thrilling and path-breaking new book." -- Stefan Berger, Professor of Social History and Director of the Institute for Social Movements, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany"Heeding Todorova's call to attend to the Balkans as ‘self-designation’, Beyond Balkanism considers the Balkan idea from the ‘inside-out’. Focusing on the Balkans as a project of regional identity formation, Mishkova breaks new ground in her recuperation of intra-regional dynamics and local regionalizations. Restoring agency to elites (both scholars and politicians) within the region, Beyond Balkanism makes a timely and much needed contribution to the literatures on European symbolic geography." -- Pamela Ballinger, Fred Cuny Chair in the History of Human Rights Department of History, University of Michigan, USA"Bringing together two decades of her research on the intellectual history of the Balkan idea, Diana Mishkova’s book not only constitutes the most thorough recent synthesis but also situates the question brilliantly in a broader comparative context. Essential reading for all those interested in the history of regional concepts in modern Europe." -- Alex Drace-Francis, Associate Professor in European Studies, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands"Diana Mishkova turns Maria Todorova’s perspective—from the outside on the Balkans—around and looks from the Balkans (a) on the outside world and (b) on the Balkans [themselves]. In methodological terms, the book makes use of a vast array of both scholarly and non-scholarly publications by foreigners on the Balkans and by authors from the region on their own part of the world. That is a highly innovative approach and as such a substantial progress." -- Stefan Troebst, professor of East European Cultural History, Leipzig University, GermanyExtract from review in Apostrof "This work is not only an extensive historiographical study, but also an impressive imagological survey focused both on the Balkans and South-East European studies in the last two centuries. Diana Mishkova’s book sheds a light on the relationship between regionalist frameworks of interpretation and the "national sciences", and [it] establishes the extent to which regional approaches in the humanities and social sciences have posed a challenge to nation-centered scholarship and presented an alternative to methodological nationalism." -- Cristian Vasile, Research Fellow, "N. Iorga" Institute of History, Romanian Academy