Presents an account of values carried by the natural world, coupled with an inquiry into duties toward animals, plants, species, and ecosystems. This work illustrates the philosophy of nature with numerous actual examples of ethical decisions made in encounters with fauna and flora, endangered species, and threatened ecosystems.

Preface 1. Humans Valuing the Natural Environment Values Carried by Nature * Value Ownership * Following Nature 2. Higher Animals: Duties to Sentient Life Natural Rights, Goods, Interests * Human Dominion over Animals * Domestic and Hunted Animals 3. Organisms: Duties to Organic Life Objective Value in Organisms * Objective Life versus Subjective Life * Human Interests and Organismic Values 4. Life in Jeopardy: Duties to Endangered Species Duties to Persons Concerning Species * Specific Forms of Life * Duties to Species * Individuals and Species * Species and Ecosystem * An Endangered Ethic? 5. Life in Community: Duties to Ecosystems Cooperation and Struggle * Centered and Loose Organization * Succession and Natural History * Individuals in Communities * Intrinsic, Instrumental, and Systemic Values * Subjective Experience and Evolutionary Ecosystems 6. The Concept of Natural Value: A Theory for Environmental Ethics Valuing Projective Nature * Valuing in Ecosystems * Valuing Aesthetic Nature 7. Environmental Policy: An Ethic of the Commons Collective Choice in an Environmental Ethic * A Value Analysis for Environmental Policy * Environmental Principles and Strategies 8. Environmental Business: An Ethic for Commerce Business and a Humanist Environmental Ethic * Business and a Naturalistic Environmental Ethic * Ethical Complexities in Business and Environmental Concerns * Business and Nature 9. Down to Earth: Persons in Natural History Humans Resident in Nature and Culture * Humans as Moral Overseers on Earth * Storied Residence on Earth Notes Selected Bibliography Index

"By refusing to be pulled toward either an economics-based or a biocentrist position, Rolston bridges an otherwise yawning gap between the two camps... A model of the environmental thinking-and acting-required now and in the future." --Christian Science Monitor "Rolston's incisive logic...poetic insights...and almost conversational style reassure the reader... With luck, lots of people will accompany him on this journey, returning with ideas with which to launch sophisticated discussions of environmental ethics." --Los Angeles Times Book Review "A brilliantly provocative challenge for us to think about how we should behave toward the environment. A required book for public and natural science collections." --Library Journal "Rolston's work--worthy of becoming a classic itself--explores values from several points of view. The work is not a carefully structured argument, but a delightful series of insights and concrete examples leading to a new gestalt a unique groundbreaking work appropriate for all reader levels." --Choice "A lucid introduction to environmental ethics that will be of value to scholars, students, and general readers. Environmental Ethics is packed with information and a good deal of wisdom obviously acquired through long experience." --Edward 0. Wilson, Harvard University "Most insightful and poetic. We need...Rolston's wisdom." --Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Sierra "Rolston's analysis is perceptive philosophy yet accessible to a general audience. His comprehensive scope, accurate references, examples given, and clarity of text make the book invaluable to students of environmental ethics in a very practical way... Rolston clearly makes the case that we now find ourselves standing at an ethical threshold. . What a wonderful effort!" --David Hales, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan "This work is vintage Rolston, which is very good. He has a wonderful and intimate knowledge of matters environmental, which he again uses here in insightfully new ways... Rolston shows the relevance of an environmental appreciation to fundamental matters of ethical theory. This book reads well, reads easily, reads enticingly." --Donald Scherer, Department of Philosophy, Bowling Green State University