âSvikâs work is well researched and adds important details to the story of aviation and globalization, particularly during the crucial postâWorld War II decades. ⌠those interested in how the Cold War context complicated the history of post-war commercial aviation, driven by tensions not only between the United States and the Soviet Union, but also between the Unites States and its allies, will find this work valuable.â (Janet R. Daly Bednarek, Technology and Culture, Vol. 63 (2), April, 2022)
âThis is a very original book about Cold War competition. In his innovative study, Peter Svik skilfully blends cold war history with the technological revolutions of the last half of the 20th century. Intense commercial and strategic competition between the US and the Soviet Union and their allies drove the development of new technologies for civilian as well as military aeroplane design. Structures, engines, and even flight routes were all shaped by this rivalry. Svik adds new dimensions to our understanding of these years, for the superpowersâ spirited competition not only generated rapid technological change, but ultimately revealed American technological superiority. At the same time, these policies also opened up civilian access to the wider world and so also contributed to the inexorable globalisation of the Cold War.â (Anne Deighton, Professor of European International Politics, University of Oxford, UK)
âGlobally, those knowledgeable about aircraft and aviation will find Peter Svikâs study of Cold War jet transportation riveting. Rarely have the intricate âpolitics of technologyâ been so carefully and convincingly detailed and analyzed. In addition to exploring the complexities of USSR-USA competition over civilian air development, this research exposes subtle rivalries within the socialist Bloc and between UK and US corporations and governments.  The final irony is Svikâs revelation that Soviet technological incapacity crippled its aircraft projects just as fully as it undermined the USSRâs computing and spaceflight initiatives. A truly welcome monograph, drawing on remarkably-diverse archival and technical sources.â (Philip Scranton, Professor of the History of Industry and Technology, Rutgers University, USA)
âThis is an important and consistently interesting book, its message reaching far beyond the circle of civil aviation enthusiasts. It shows that the Soviet aviation remained stuck in the late fifties and early sixties, at a time when its western competitors experienced great improvements in engineering, design, and use of new materials. The book offers technical details that are certain to satisfy the most discerning expert on the evolution of aircraft engines. However, its main message is political. Â Svik shows that from the early sixties onward, the Soviet civilian realm stayed on autopilot, while the state focused primarily on improving its military assets. As the West rushed head on toward a new computer-based economy, the civilian sphere of the Communist bloc was trapped in the past. Svik, a rising star among Cold War historians, demonstrates that the East-West technological gap was one of the reasons for the Soviet bloc collapse from 1989 to 1991.â (Igor Lukes, Professor of History & International Relations, Pardee School of Global Studies, Boston University, USA)
 âCompetition in civil aviation was a fundamental aspect of the Cold War conflict over modernity. This book is an excellent introduction to the most recent research on the topic and a reminder of how technological rivalries can influence international affairs.â (O.A. Westad, Elihu Professor of History and Global Affairs, Yale University, USA)
âThis is a work of high quality that delves into the economic, political, ideological, and technological dimensions of civil aviation as an issue of contention between the superpowers during the Cold War. Providing unique insights into the Soviet position and Eastern bloc aviation in general, it shows that cooperation and cross-bloc interchange also occurred alongside the expected competition and conflict. A unique addition to our understanding of Cold War dynamics.â (Giles Scott-Smith, Roosevelt Chair in New Diplomatic History, Leiden University)