Excellent.

The Wall Street Journal

One of — if not, the — most significant contributions to understanding relationships between states and the ICC in recent years.

Journal of International Criminal Justice

The best account so far of the trajectory of the ICC from its optimistic origins to the more constrained court of today.... Written in an engaging and accessible style, the book should be of interest to the nonspecialist as well.

Ethics & International Affairs

Se alle

Energetic, well-written, and genuinely informative.

International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis

Excellent.

Texas Law Review

A rigorously researched and credible piece of work with the readability and up-to-date feeling of a blog.... Rough Justice is an excellent work on the recent history of the ICC, succinct and subtle in its analysis.

Berkeley Journal of International Law

David Bosco's Rough Justice is one of - if not, the - most significant contributions to understanding relationships between states and the ICC in recent years. Impressively researched, accessibly composed and cogently argued, Bosco skilfully lays out a political history of the Court that not only elucidates why and how powerful states engage with the ICC but also how the Court manages its relations with the states upon which its legitimacy and effectiveness depend ... Both liberal and realist oriented scholars should read Bosco's sophisticated account of the ICC.

Mark Kersten, Journal of International Criminal Justice

The Nuremberg trials after World War II constituted a landmark in the development of international criminal justice: presided over by jurists from the victorious powers, it set new standards for defining international war crimes. Set in motion shortly after the creation of the United Nations, the courts seemed to point toward a future in which the international community could more effectively prosecute crimes against humanity and advance the cause of justice and the rule of law throughout the world. However, the onset of the Cold War stymied all efforts to create an effective international criminal court. Neither the US nor the USSR was willing to face the possibility of being judged in a forum controlled by ideological adversaries. Despite the lack of progress, the dream of the court lived on through the 1980s, and when the Cold War ended, a new opportunity arose. After the UN's creation of temporary courts during the Balkan wars of the early 1990s, a powerful grassroots movement championing a permanent international criminal court emerged. Facing stiff resistance from the US and other powerful states, the movement triumphed against great odds. The court was established in 2002, and it now has the support of over 100 states (but not the US). The US opposes it outright and the Russians and Chinese are skeptical of it for a simple reason: as the most powerful states, they have no intention of surrendering jurisdictional authority over their own citizens to lesser powers. As a consequence, the court has faced numerous setbacks, and many have questioned whether it has any real power at all. It has ended up focusing its energies on pursuing war criminals in weak states, typically in Africa. It is now caught on the horns of a dilemma: to pursue justice, it does what it can where it can, but it cannot actually prosecute figures in powerful states. Russia will never surrender troops who may have acted badly in Georgia, and America is not about to hand over soldiers who killed civilians in Afghanistan. Yet the court has had some minor successes, and we should remember that it is still in its very early days. As the years pass, its jurisdictional authority may expand, and the norms that it advances may achieve the status of common sense. Time will tell. In Rough Justice, David Bosco tells the story of the movement to establish the court and its tumultuous first decade. He also considers its prospects for the future, especially the very real challenges that it faces. This is an authoritative account of an international institution that is prototypical of the post-Cold War era.
Les mer
The story of the movement to establish the International Criminal Court, its tumultuous first decade, and the challenges it will continue to face in the future.
Introduction ; 1. A Framework for Analysis ; 2. Origins ; 3. The Phantom Court (1998-2002) ; 4. Caution and Consensus (July 2002-March 2005) ; 5. Breakthrough (2005-2008) ; 6. Power Plays (2008-2012) ; Conclusion: A Constrained Court
Les mer
"Excellent." -- The Wall Street Journal "One of DL if not, the DL most significant contributions to understanding relationships between states and the ICC in recent years." -- Journal of International Criminal Justice "The best account so far of the trajectory of the ICC from its optimistic origins to the more constrained court of today.... Written in an engaging and accessible style, the book should be of interest to the nonspecialist as well." -- Ethics & International Affairs "Energetic, well-written, and genuinely informative." -- International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis "Excellent." -- Texas Law Review "A rigorously researched and credible piece of work with the readability and up-to-date feeling of a blog.... Rough Justice is an excellent work on the recent history of the ICC, succinct and subtle in its analysis." -- Berkeley Journal of International Law "Is the International Criminal Court one of humanity's great achievements or just another futile multilateral organization? Many see it as an important step towards making the world more just, while several nations - including the United States - consider it a threat. What is it? While the answers are controversial, the facts about the Court are not, and in this extraordinary book, David Bosco gives us the history and the facts and smartly guides us on how to think about an institution that may change the world. A must read." --Moises Naim, Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of The End of Power "This is the most realistic and insightful book ever written on the ICC, one that surprises in showing how much the ICC has accomplished since its founding, and how integral the United States has become to its success." --Jack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School "David Bosco has produced the first balanced and sophisticated assessment of the International Criminal Court's opening decade. Blending legal analysis and political science, he analyzes both the Court's power and the continuing constraints on that power, in a way that is likely to frame both scholarly and policy debates about the Court in its second decade. A significant achievement." --Anne-Marie Slaughter, Princeton University and President and CEO, New America Foundation "David Bosco's lucid and thoughtful analysis of how the major powers try (and sometimes succeed) to control or marginalize the International Criminal Court should be required reading for anyone interested in the Court and international institutions. As in Five to Rule Them All, Bosco expertly makes his insightful scholarly analysis appealing to a broader audience." --Erik Voeten, Edmund E. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University "In this sober and clear-eyed account of the ICC, David Bosco expertly shows the reasons for the United States' evolving and more accepting attitude toward the court. Based on interviews with many of the key players, Bosco has woven a compelling and well-written rendering of the evolving relationship between the United States and the ICC." --Michael Barnett, The George Washington University "David Bosco's aim, namely to reveal the mutual accommodation that exists between the major powers and the court, is rich in theory, practice, and the kind of eloquent insights he is well known for in his Foreign Policy column. If you want to know how the International Criminal Court has launched its quest for accountability of leaders charged with atrocity crimes and how the United States and other key governments have influenced the Court's destiny, then this is the book you have to read." --David Scheffer, Northwestern University and former U.S. Ambassador at Large for War Crimes Issues "A comprehensive and highly readable history of the International Criminal Court from its roots in Nuremburg through the Rome Statute in 1998 through the first decade of the Court's operations, with a particular emphasis on the Court's sometimes strained relations with the United States and other major powers. A must read for anyone interested in the ICC." --John Bellinger, Legal Adviser to the State Department, 2005-2009 "The clash of idealism and reality in international relations, and the limits of achieving justice, are well limned in Bosco's accessible history of the International Criminal Court (ICC) . . . The author does an especially fine job of outlining the United States' evolving relationship with the tribunal, which could potentially subject U.S. leaders to criminal charges. Bosco's conclusion--that 'the ICC has been significantly constrained by major-power politics'--will surprise no one, but his measured analysis is a major contribution to the study of the issue." --Publishers Weekly "A comprehensive, well-documented, and clearly written analysis of an important international institution." --Library Journal
Les mer
Selling point: A meticulously researched and accessibly written work on one of the most important but problematic developments in international law Selling point: Author has access to many of the court's principals and is able to provide an insider's perspective Selling point: The definitive account of the Court and its uneven progress toward advancing accountability around the world
Les mer
David Bosco teaches international politics and law at American University's School of International Service. He is the author of Five to Rule Them All: The UN Security Council and the Making of the Modern World. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he is a former attorney and senior editor at Foreign Policy magazine. He writes the Multilateralist blog for Foreign Policy.
Les mer
Selling point: A meticulously researched and accessibly written work on one of the most important but problematic developments in international law Selling point: Author has access to many of the court's principals and is able to provide an insider's perspective Selling point: The definitive account of the Court and its uneven progress toward advancing accountability around the world
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780199844135
Publisert
2014
Utgiver
Oxford University Press Inc
Vekt
544 gr
Høyde
160 mm
Bredde
236 mm
Dybde
33 mm
Aldersnivå
UU, UP, 05
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
312

Forfatter

Biografisk notat

David Bosco teaches international politics and law at American University's School of International Service. He is the author of Five to Rule Them All: The UN Security Council and the Making of the Modern World. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he is a former attorney and senior editor at Foreign Policy magazine. He writes the Multilateralist blog for Foreign Policy.