What would Aristotle and Xunzi have made of one another's ethical systems? Thanks to Jingyi Jenny Zhao, we are closer than ever to envisioning that conversation. Zhao's subtle virtuosity in multiple realms--philology, philosophy, and cultural history--equips her to do groundbreaking work in the field of what I call 'Comparative Classics.'
John Kirby, University of Miami
Jingyi Jenny Zhao has conducted a philologically sensitive, philosophically rich, and context-specific analysis of the role of shame in Aristotle's and Xunzi's views of moral education and the good life. Written with lucidity and poise, the book persuasively demonstrates how rewarding the comparative study of ancient philosophy could be.
Yiqun Zhou, Stanford University
In a time when Chinese scholars are showing interest in the history of Western philosophy...This volume is a significant publication that provides a synoptic gaze at where things stand in research on William James. This work will be of interest to students and academics alike....Zhao has written a helpful comparative study of one major thinker from each tradition. Rather than attempting a systematic comparison of Aristotle and Xunzi's entire philosophies, she wisely focuses on the role each attributes to shame in the moral life... Recommended. General readers through undergraduates
Choice
In this pioneering study of Aristotle and Xunzi, Jingyi Jenny Zhao develops a sophisticated cross-cultural methodology that, when applied in a close engagement with their views on topics such as the importance of the emotions in moral education and the nature of the good life, yields deeper understanding of issues of philosophical importance both for them and for us today
Geoffrey Lloyd, University of Cambridge