Indecent Screen Regulating Television in the Twenty-First Century
Produktdetaljer
Biografisk notat
CYNTHIA CHRIS is an associate professor and chair of the department of media culture at The College of Staten Island, City University of New York, and affiliated faculty in women's and gender studies at the CUNY Graduate Center. She is the author or coeditor of Watching Wildlife, Cable Visions, and Media Authorship.Indecent Screen Regulating Television in the Twenty-First Century
"<i>The Indecent Screen </i>may represent the literal 'bookend' on the history of broadcasting in relation to questions of choice in the market, public service and the airwaves, and decency. It could not be more timely and engaged with present debates." — Victoria E. Johnson, author of Heartland TV: Prime Time Television and the Struggle for U.S. Identity<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is an incisive look at the limits and limitations of contemporary media policy."— Jennifer Holt, author of Empires of Entertainment: Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980-1996<br /> "Instead of...innovations quelling concerns that TV networks were too often transmitting indecent material that was accessible to children, complaints about indecency skyrocketed soon after the turn of the century. Chris demonstrates that these clashes are significant battles over the role of family, the role of government, and the value of free speech in our lives, arguing that an uncensored media is so imperative to the public good that we can, and must, endure the occasional indecent screen."— Concurring Opinions<br /> "Recommended."— Choice<br /> "Mass Communication and media law scholars will find this text most helpful." — Communications Booknotes Quarterly<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is a unique and necessary contribution to the field of censorship studies, and like broadcast television itself, justifies its place with enthralling detail and a powerful, complex history."— Journal of Digital Media & Policy<br /> "Instead of...innovations quelling concerns that TV networks were too often transmitting indecent material that was accessible to children, complaints about indecency skyrocketed soon after the turn of the century. Chris demonstrates that these clashes are significant battles over the role of family, the role of government, and the value of free speech in our lives, arguing that an uncensored media is so imperative to the public good that we can, and must, endure the occasional indecent screen."— Concurring Opinions<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is a unique and necessary contribution to the field of censorship studies, and like broadcast television itself, justifies its place with enthralling detail and a powerful, complex history."— Journal of Digital Media & Policy<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen </i>may represent the literal 'bookend' on the history of broadcasting in relation to questions of choice in the market, public service and the airwaves, and decency. It could not be more timely and engaged with present debates." — Victoria E. Johnson, author of Heartland TV: Prime Time Television and the Struggle for U.S. Identity<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is an incisive look at the limits and limitations of contemporary media policy."— Jennifer Holt, author of Empires of Entertainment: Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980-1996<br /> "Recommended."— Choice<br /> "Mass Communication and media law scholars will find this text most helpful." — Communications Booknotes Quarterly<br />
Chronology
List of Abbreviations
Introduction: What We Talk About When We Talk About Television and Indecency
1 A Brief History of Indecency in Media in the Twentieth Century
2 Targeting Television in the Twenty-First Century
3 Television: More or Less?
4 Bleeps and Other Obscenities
5 Who's Afraid of Dick Smart? The Body Politic, Public Access, and the Punitive State
Conclusion: The Future of Indecency, and Why It Matters
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
"<i>The Indecent Screen </i>may represent the literal 'bookend' on the history of broadcasting in relation to questions of choice in the market, public service and the airwaves, and decency. It could not be more timely and engaged with present debates." — Victoria E. Johnson, author of Heartland TV: Prime Time Television and the Struggle for U.S. Identity<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is an incisive look at the limits and limitations of contemporary media policy."— Jennifer Holt, author of Empires of Entertainment: Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980-1996<br /> "Instead of...innovations quelling concerns that TV networks were too often transmitting indecent material that was accessible to children, complaints about indecency skyrocketed soon after the turn of the century. Chris demonstrates that these clashes are significant battles over the role of family, the role of government, and the value of free speech in our lives, arguing that an uncensored media is so imperative to the public good that we can, and must, endure the occasional indecent screen."— Concurring Opinions<br /> "Recommended."— Choice<br /> "Mass Communication and media law scholars will find this text most helpful." — Communications Booknotes Quarterly<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is a unique and necessary contribution to the field of censorship studies, and like broadcast television itself, justifies its place with enthralling detail and a powerful, complex history."— Journal of Digital Media & Policy<br /> "Instead of...innovations quelling concerns that TV networks were too often transmitting indecent material that was accessible to children, complaints about indecency skyrocketed soon after the turn of the century. Chris demonstrates that these clashes are significant battles over the role of family, the role of government, and the value of free speech in our lives, arguing that an uncensored media is so imperative to the public good that we can, and must, endure the occasional indecent screen."— Concurring Opinions<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is a unique and necessary contribution to the field of censorship studies, and like broadcast television itself, justifies its place with enthralling detail and a powerful, complex history."— Journal of Digital Media & Policy<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen </i>may represent the literal 'bookend' on the history of broadcasting in relation to questions of choice in the market, public service and the airwaves, and decency. It could not be more timely and engaged with present debates." — Victoria E. Johnson, author of Heartland TV: Prime Time Television and the Struggle for U.S. Identity<br /> "<i>The Indecent Screen</i> is an incisive look at the limits and limitations of contemporary media policy."— Jennifer Holt, author of Empires of Entertainment: Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980-1996<br /> "Recommended."— Choice<br /> "Mass Communication and media law scholars will find this text most helpful." — Communications Booknotes Quarterly<br />
Chronology
List of Abbreviations
Introduction: What We Talk About When We Talk About Television and Indecency
1 A Brief History of Indecency in Media in the Twentieth Century
2 Targeting Television in the Twenty-First Century
3 Television: More or Less?
4 Bleeps and Other Obscenities
5 Who's Afraid of Dick Smart? The Body Politic, Public Access, and the Punitive State
Conclusion: The Future of Indecency, and Why It Matters
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index