Hard Questions is a literate and compelling example of the sort of adventure Kekes is recommending philosophers and the rest of us to undertake.

Philosophy

This extraordinary book of practical philosophy is carefully organized, clearly written, and filled with illuminating discussions of compelling examples. Kekes presses gently, relentlessly, and provocatively for the irreducible plurality of conflicting values within our lives, and the absence of any absolute value, abstract moral principle, or controlling moral commitment that resolves those conflicts in hard cases. His remedy for this is equally clear, and equally provocative.

Lawrence C. Becker, Kenan Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, College of William and Mary, and author of Habilitation, Health, and Agency: A Framework for Basic Justice

This book poses questions of ethics, broadly-construed, but they involve metaphysics (for example, duties to God, questions about the origins of evil, whether the cosmos is just) and epistemology. John Kekess focus is on reasons for different answers to each question. He writes with such sympathy and wisdom that readers can see both sides, with two opposing answers to each question often as good for the person or group that holds them. This is a well-written and smart book, and the reader will know herself in the hands of a learned and thoughtful guide.

Owen Flanagan, James B. Duke Professor of Philosophy, Duke University

In this book, John Kekes discusses the hard questions we all must face in the course of our lives. Is there an absolute value that overrides all other considerations? Must we conform to prevailing conventions? Do we owe what our country asks of us? Must justice be done at all costs? How should we respond to evil? Should we forgive wrong actions? Does shame make life better or worse? Is it always good to be true to who we are? Do good intentions justify bad actions? Are moral values the highest of all values? There are reasonable answers to these questions, but we find that they often conflict. Their conflicts compel us to weigh the consequences of how the decisions we make affect ourselves, our relationships, and our attitude to the society in which we live. In this clearly and accessibly written book, Kekes compares and evaluates the reasons that have been given for and against answers to these hard questions by those who actually faced them. By learning from the successes and failures of the decisions others have made, we can understand better how we should respond to the hard questions we ourselves face. We can then evaluate more reasonably the possibilities open to us and the limitations to which we are subject. This approach is an alternative to both the absolutist and the relativist ways of trying to answer hard questions. Absolutists have, for millennia, fruitlessly searched for an authoritative answer that reason requires everyone to accept. Their failure have led relativists to assume that there comes a point at which we run out of reasons and have no option but to make an arbitrary decision. Kekes instead offers a message of hope by showing that there are reasonable answers to hard questions, which are neither absolute, nor arbitrary.
Les mer
Acknowledgments A Note to the Reader Chapter One: Introduction Chapter Two: Is There an Absolute Value? Chapter Three: Must We Conform? Chapter Four: Do We Owe What Our Country Asks of Us? Chapter Five: Is Justice Necessary? Chapter Six: How Should We Respond to Evil? Chapter Seven: Is it Right to Forgive Wrong Actions? Chapter Eight: Is Shame Good? Chapter Nine: Should We Be True to Who We Are? Chapter Ten: Do Good Intentions Justify Bad Actions? Chapter Eleven: Should Moral Evaluations Be Overriding? Chapter Twelve: Conclusion
Les mer
"Hard Questions is a literate and compelling example of the sort of adventure Kekes is recommending philosophers and the rest of us to undertake." -- Philosophy "This extraordinary book of practical philosophy is carefully organized, clearly written, and filled with illuminating discussions of compelling examples. Kekes presses gently, relentlessly, and provocatively for the irreducible plurality of conflicting values within our lives, and the absence of any absolute value, abstract moral principle, or controlling moral commitment that resolves those conflicts in hard cases. His remedy for this is equally clear, and equally provocative."--Lawrence C. Becker, Kenan Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, College of William and Mary, and author of Habilitation, Health, and Agency: A Framework for Basic Justice "This book poses questions of ethics, broadly-construed, but they involve metaphysics (for example, duties to God, questions about the origins of evil, whether the cosmos is just) and epistemology. John Kekesâs focus is on reasons for different answers to each question. He writes with such sympathy and wisdom that readers can see both sides, with two opposing answers to each question often as good for the person or group that holds them. This is a well-written and smart book, and the reader will know herself in the hands of a learned and thoughtful guide."--Owen Flanagan, James B. Duke Professor of Philosophy, Duke University
Les mer
Selling point: Offers new ways of confronting some of life's most difficult questions Selling point: Provides a comparative approach that stresses life's possibilities, and what we can learn from anthropology, history, and literature about the great variety of solutions to normative questions Selling point: Presents a pluralistic alternative to both the absolutist and relativist normative theories that dominate contemporary discussions Selling point: Offers a refreshing alternative to the insularity of contemporary normative discussions
Les mer
John Kekes is the author of many books, including The Roots of Evil (Cornell University Press), Enjoyment (OUP), The Human Condition (OUP), and How Should We Live? (Chicago University Press). He has been visiting professor in Canada, England, Estonia, Hungary, Portugal, Singapore, and the United States Military Academy.
Les mer
Selling point: Offers new ways of confronting some of life's most difficult questions Selling point: Provides a comparative approach that stresses life's possibilities, and what we can learn from anthropology, history, and literature about the great variety of solutions to normative questions Selling point: Presents a pluralistic alternative to both the absolutist and relativist normative theories that dominate contemporary discussions Selling point: Offers a refreshing alternative to the insularity of contemporary normative discussions
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780190919986
Publisert
2019
Utgiver
Oxford University Press Inc
Vekt
567 gr
Høyde
211 mm
Bredde
147 mm
Dybde
28 mm
Aldersnivå
G, 01
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
320

Forfatter

Biografisk notat

John Kekes is the author of many books, including The Roots of Evil (Cornell University Press), Enjoyment (OUP), The Human Condition (OUP), and How Should We Live? (Chicago University Press). He has been visiting professor in Canada, England, Estonia, Hungary, Portugal, Singapore, and the United States Military Academy.