Life Conduct in Modern Times Karl Jaspers and Psychoanalysis
Produktdetaljer
On the German version of this book: "As a profound expert on the work of Karl Jaspers, the author has carefully and in a well-informed manner investigated the philosopher's controversy with the leading psychoanalysts of the time. [...] All in all an extensive study that captivates through its extraordinary quality of language." - Christian Muller, Gesnerus. Swiss Journal of the History of Medicine and Sciences "A masterwork of a scholarly, clear and impartial presentation which illuminates the border area between philosophy and psychoanalysis." - Hartmut Raguse, Theologische Literaturzeitung "Simply impressive. Bormuth undertakes nothing less than to reconstruct the philosophy of Jaspers in its complete historical context." - Ingo-Wolf Kittel, Der Nervenarzt
The German version of this book received the main award in 2001 of the prestigious Stehr-Boldt-Fonds of the University of Zürich for scientific research combining questions of medical ethics with social interest.
This award-winning book investigates the critique of psychoanalysis formulated by the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) over a period of five decades. His arguments against Freud and his followers are examined from systematic perspectives. The study traces the medico-historical roots of Jasper’s criticism of psychoanalysis and then places it within the framework of scientific theory before devoting itself extensively to medico-ethical aspects of the controversy, which are ultimately treated in terms of a history of mentalities. According to this view, Jasper’s student Hannah Arendt saw to it that the philosopher be made aware of the socio-cultural impact which psychoanalysis was beginning to have in the U.S.A. The philosopher came to look upon psychoanalysis as a theory – in particular as it was propagated after 1945 in Germany and the U.S. – whose claim to scientific objectivity constituted a serious threat to the freedom of the individual. Max Weber’s theory of science and his concept of modernity serve as a critical guide for the interpretation. Thus the normative premise of the investigation is the liberal idea that in a secular and pluralistic society it is ultimately the individual who is to take responsibility for life conduct.