This book is a highly valuable contribution to practical philosophy. It gets a hugely important topic on the table in a serious way without compromising readability. If you are looking for an engaging and provocative addition to your personal library, or for your ethics or political philosophy courses, I highly recommend this book.

Jason Marsh, Journal of Moral Philosophy

A philosopher's nuanced, unapologetic proposal for a world in environmental crisis.

Karen Shook, Times Higher Education

One Child is hard to resist. Conly starts from a well-developed empirical basis -- multiply-sourced news about the devastation we court, but which she deploys modestly. ... Lucid, engaging, and empirically saturated ... These discussions are wholly pertinent and quite well done

Jamie Lindemann, Philosophers' Magazine

Se alle

Sarah Conly's book tackles an urgent, under-discussed topic: Is having children an unlimited, personal right? Or is this view no longer tenable in an era of vast increases in human population? Professor Conly rejects unlimited procreation rights and defends a one child per family limit as a moral imperative and perhaps as a legal requirement. This very fine book is clearly written, thorough in its treatment of the issues, and very fair to the opposing views.

Stephen Nathanson, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Northeastern University

...this is a well-crafted book on a very important topic... It is probably laypersons and undergraduate students who will benefit the most from reading this book.

Peter Murphy, Metapsychology

Sarah Conly argues that we do not have the right to have more than one child. If recent increases in global population continue, we will reduce the welfare of future generations to unacceptable levels. We do not have a right to impose on others in this way. While voluntary efforts to restrain population growth are preferable and may be enough, government regulations against having more than one child can be justified if they are necessary. Of course, government regulations have to be consistent with rights that we do hold, but Conly argues that since we do not have a right to have more than one child, government regulations are one of the methods we might use to reduce the fertility rate until we reach a sustainable population.
Les mer
Sarah Conly argues that at present we do not have the right to have more than one child. We do not need to have more than one to live a good life, and having more than one when we are at risk of depleting our environmental resources is simply too dangerous to others.
Les mer
Chapter I: The Problem ; Chapter II: The Right to Have Children-Part One ; Chapter III: The Right to Have Children-Part Two ; Chapter IV: Sanctions ; Chapter V: The Future ; Chapter VI: Unexpected Consequences ; Chapter VII: Conclusion: What and When ; Index
Les mer
"This book is a highly valuable contribution to practical philosophy. It gets a hugely important topic on the table in a serious way without compromising readability. If you are looking for an engaging and provocative addition to your personal library, or for your ethics or political philosophy courses, I highly recommend this book." -- Jason Marsh, Journal of Moral Philosophy "Sarah Conly's book tackles an urgent, under-discussed topic: Is having children an unlimited, personal right? Or is this view no longer tenable in an era of vast increases in human population? Professor Conly rejects unlimited procreation rights and defends a one child per family limit as a moral imperative and perhaps as a legal requirement. This very fine book is clearly written, thorough in its treatment of the issues, and very fair to the opposing views."--Stephen Nathanson, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Northeastern University "...this is a well-crafted book on a very important topic...It is probably laypersons and undergraduate students who will benefit the most from reading this book." -- Metapsychology Online Reviews "One Child is hard to resist. Conly starts from a well-developed empirical basis--multiply-sourced news about the devastation we court, but which she deploys modestly...Lucid, engaging, and empirically saturated...These discussions are wholly pertinent and quite well done." -- Philosophers' Magazine
Les mer
Selling point: Argues that we have the right to one, and only one, child Selling point: Examines the environmental costs of reproduction Selling point: Proposes that some instances of governmental control over reproduction are acceptable
Les mer
Sarah Conly is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Bowdoin College and the author of Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism (2013).
Selling point: Argues that we have the right to one, and only one, child Selling point: Examines the environmental costs of reproduction Selling point: Proposes that some instances of governmental control over reproduction are acceptable
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780190203436
Publisert
2016
Utgiver
Oxford University Press Inc
Vekt
386 gr
Høyde
211 mm
Bredde
137 mm
Dybde
28 mm
Aldersnivå
G, 01
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
260

Forfatter

Biografisk notat

Sarah Conly is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Bowdoin College and the author of Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism (2012).