Broad has succeeded in writing a book that will be accessible to a range of readers, from undergraduates to specialists ... I predict that it will quickly become essential reading for anyone interested in Astell's work.
Deborah Boyle, Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Broad provides a new and highly illuminating perspective on Astell . . . a truly comprehensive analysis of Astells work. Broad has succeeded in writing a book that will be accessible to a range of readers,from undergraduates to specialists. Her lucidly written discussions of the philosophical issues at play in Astells work are clear and succinct enough to situate the newcomer, but deep enough to be of interest to readers with more background knowledge. I predict that it will quickly become essential reading for anyone interested in Astells work. It should also appeal to those interested more generally in the history of modern philosophy and the history of feminism.
Deborah Boyle, Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Broad argues that Astell represents a distinctive female voice in ethics, since her ethical concerns are specific to women and are not represented in men's ethical writings. Instead of spending time trying to explain Astell's absence from philosophy, she shifts attention to the more positive issue of 'the implications of writing her back in.' One of the many merits of this study is that it suggests common ground between Astell's philosophy and themes of more interest to the secular present, including the question of moral freedoms, arguing that Astell finds echoes in the concerns of modern feminists ... Jacqueline Broad's study of Mary Astell takes our understanding of Astell as a philosopher to a new level and will serve as a model for the study of other female philosophers.
Sarah Hutton, Journal of the History of Philosophy
...everyone will learn from this text, several debates about Astell are resolved in it, and Astell's philosophical status is generally elevated.
Penny Weiss, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Online