<i>‘Contributing to comparative constitutional studies and feminist legal theory, this collection offers food for thought about what differences occur when women—and feminists, not always the same—take leadership roles on high courts, including differences in what leadership actually consists of. Particularly valuable are the essays that bring perspectives from the Global South into the conversation.’</i>
- Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School, USA,
<i>‘Through compiling dozens of essays about the contribution of women judges in courts around the world, Erin Delaney and Rosalind Dixon give readers a unique opportunity to learn about the impact of gender on comparative law, court structures, and on individuals. Their volume of grounded analyses enables insights into how, when, and why gender matters for courts and for the populations they serve.’</i>
- Judith Resnik, Yale Law School, USA,
Leading scholars outline the origins and significance of the steadily growing number of female chief justices and court presidents across the globe. They provide valuable insights into the conditions that support increased female participation and representation in law and public life, as well as ongoing challenges and barriers. Chapters draw on perspectives from both common and civil law, as well as feminist constitutional theory, covering topics such as judicial responses to democratic backsliding, comparative leadership styles, right-wing female actors in authoritarian regimes, and gendered silences in judicial histories. The book explores the notion of feminist judicial heroines, emphasising the difference between female versus feminist judges.
This book is an exceptional resource for legal scholars and students with interests in gender and feminist dimensions of constitutionalism. It is also an essential read for judges and lawyers interested in the history and future of feminist jurisprudence.