Just Peace After Conflict ... is the first legal, scholarly work to identify the substantive elements of a just peace. It relates the concept to historical and recent practical cases of peacebuilding, and addresses a number of relevant, understudied issues of peacebuilding practice such as UN peacekeeping mandates, the legal arrangement of illegal settlement and the protection of labour rights and indigenous people.

Ahmed Kamal Badr, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law

This is an interesting book about a fascinating and important subject.

David Pickup, Law Society Gazette

The interplay between peace and justice plays an important role in any contemporary conflict. Peace can be described in a variety ways, as being 'negative' or 'positive', 'liberal' or 'democratic'. But what is it that makes a peace just? This book draws together leading scholars to study this concept of a 'just peace', analysing different elements of the transition from conflict to peace. The volume covers six core themes: conceptual approaches towards just peace, macro-principles, the nexus to security and stability, protection of persons and public goods, rule of law, and economic reform and accountability. Contributions engage with understudied issues, such as the pros and cons of robust UN mandates, the link between environmental protection and indigenous peoples, the treatment of illegal settlements, the feasibility of vetting practices, and the protection of labour rights in post-conflict economies. Overall, the book puts forward a case that just peace requires not only negotiation, agreement, and compromise, but contextual understandings of law, multiple dimensions of justice, and strategies of prevention. This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations.
Les mer
Opinions over the nature of a 'just peace' are divided. In this third output of a major research project on Jus Post Bellum, Stahn, Iverson, and Easterday bring together a team of experts to argue that a just peace is not only related to form and process, but involves 'substantive' justice: a just order, a secure peace, and societal acceptance.
Les mer
1. Jus Post Bellum and Just Peace: An Introduction, Carsten Stahn PART I: JUS POST BELLUM AND CONCEPTIONS OF PEACE 2. Roots and Branches: The Past and Future of Jus Post Bellum, Brian Orend 3. A Just and Lasting Peace After War, Lonneke Peperkamp 4. Parameters of Sustainable Peace: UN Frameworks and Practice, Martin Wählisch PART II: MACRO PRINCIPLES 5. Jus Post Bellum and Proportionality, Michael A. Newton 6. Reconciliation and a Just Peace, James Gallen 7. Jus Post Bellum and the Evolution of Reparations: Reframing Reparations as Peace Building, Cymie R. Payne 8. Mapping a Norm of Inclusion in the Jus Post Bellum, Catherine Turner PART III: SECURITY AND STABILITY 9. Legal Protection of the Environment: The Double Challenge of Non-International Armed Conflict and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, , Dieter Fleck 10. Robust Peacekeeping Mandates: An Assessment in Light of Jus Post Bellum, Marco Longobardo 11. Power Shift: Assessing the Role of Mediators on the Jus Post Bellum, Patrick Wall PART IV : PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PUBLIC GOODS 12. Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Protection in Jus Post Bellum, Britta Sjöstedt 13. The Jus Post Bellum of Illegally Transferred Settler Populations, Eugene Kontorovich 14. Right to Land, Housing, and Property, Elisenda Calvet Martinez and Aitor Diaz Anabitarte PART V: RULE OF LAW REFORM AND ECONOMIC REFORM 15. Jus Post Bellum as Definition and Practice, Maj Grasten 16. Vetting: The Way to Prevent Recurrence?, Alexander Mayer-Rieckh 17. Norm Persistence in Distributive Justice: Labour Rights, Michael Pugh PART VI : ACCOUNTABILITY 18. The Long Tail of World War II: Jus Post Bellum in Contemporary East Asia,Timothy Webster 19. Inclusion, Justice, and Peace in Colombia, Jennifer Easterday
Les mer
Explores and examines the question of what constitutes a just peace Relates findings in just war theory, peace studies and international relations to contemporary legal discourses Engages with key and understudied issues of inquiry, such as the pros and cons of robust UN mandates, the protection of indigenous peoples and the treatment of illegal settlements
Les mer
Carsten Stahn is Professor of International Criminal Law and Global Justice at Leiden University and is Professor of Public International Law and International Criminal Justice at Queen's University Belfast School of Law. He has previously worked as Legal Officer in Chambers of the International Criminal Court (2003-2007) and as Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (2000-2003). He obtained his PhD degree (summa cum laude) from Humboldt University Berlin after completing his First and Second State Exam in Law in Germany. He holds LL.M. degrees from New York University and Cologne/Paris I (Panthéon-Sorbonne). He has published 13 books and over 70 articles/essays in different fields of international law and international justice. He is Editor of the Leiden Journal of International Law and Correspondent of the Netherlands International Law Review. Jens Iverson is Assistant Professor of Public International Law at the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies, Leiden Law School. A member of the California Bar, the Thurston Society, and the Order of the Coif, he received his Juris Doctor cum laude from the University of California, Hastings, and his Bachelor of Arts from Yale University. He has worked with the Cambodian Genocide Program, the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court. As the co-founder of a human rights clinic, he helped represent the former Prime Minister of Haiti in a successful petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that ultimately resulted in a landmark ruling requiring Haitian prison reform. He has practiced at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia on both the Popovic et al and Prlic et al cases.
Les mer
Explores and examines the question of what constitutes a just peace Relates findings in just war theory, peace studies and international relations to contemporary legal discourses Engages with key and understudied issues of inquiry, such as the pros and cons of robust UN mandates, the protection of indigenous peoples and the treatment of illegal settlements This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9780198823285
Publisert
2020
Utgiver
Oxford University Press
Vekt
856 gr
Høyde
254 mm
Bredde
181 mm
Dybde
27 mm
Aldersnivå
P, 06
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
382

Biografisk notat

Carsten Stahn is Professor of International Criminal Law and Global Justice at Leiden University and is Professor of Public International Law and International Criminal Justice at Queen's University Belfast School of Law. He has previously worked as Legal Officer in Chambers of the International Criminal Court (2003-2007) and as Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (2000-2003). He obtained his PhD degree (summa cum laude) from Humboldt University Berlin after completing his First and Second State Exam in Law in Germany. He holds LL.M. degrees from New York University and Cologne/Paris I (Panthéon-Sorbonne). He has published 13 books and over 70 articles/essays in different fields of international law and international justice. He is Editor of the Leiden Journal of International Law and Correspondent of the Netherlands International Law Review. Jens Iverson is Assistant Professor of Public International Law at the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies, Leiden Law School. A member of the California Bar, the Thurston Society, and the Order of the Coif, he received his Juris Doctor cum laude from the University of California, Hastings, and his Bachelor of Arts from Yale University. He has worked with the Cambodian Genocide Program, the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, and the Coalition for the International Criminal Court. As the co-founder of a human rights clinic, he helped represent the former Prime Minister of Haiti in a successful petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that ultimately resulted in a landmark ruling requiring Haitian prison reform. He has practiced at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia on both the Popovic et al and Prlic et al cases.