Contributors 1. Law Viewed Through the Lens of Neurointerventions Nicole A Vincent, Thomas Nadelhoffer, and Allan McCay PART I. CONCEPTUAL, ETHICAL, AND JURISPRUDENTIAL ISSUES 2. Cognitive Enhancement: Defending the Parity Principle Neil Levy 3. Why Means Matter: Legally Relevant Differences Between Direct and Indirect Interventions into Other Minds Jan Christoph Bublitz 4. Neuroprosthetics, Behavior Control, and Criminal Responsibility Walter Glannon 5. Is There Anything Wrong With Using AI Implantable Brain Devices to Prevent Convicted Offenders from Reoffending? Frédéric Gilbert and Susan Dodds 6. Offering Neurointerventions to Offenders With Cognitive-Emotional Impairments: Ethical and Criminal Justice Aspects Farah Focquaert, Kristof Van Assche, and Sigrid Sterckx 7. Diversion Courts, Traumatic Brain Injury, and American Vets Valerie Gray Hardcastle 8. Neurobionic Revenge Porn and the Criminal Law: Brain DL Computer Interfaces and Intimate Image Abuse Allan McCay PART II. PUNISHING PEOPLE 9. Folk Jurisprudence and Neurointervention: An Interdisciplinary Investigation Thomas Nadelhoffer, Daniela Goya- Tocchetto, Jennifer Cole Wright, and Quinn McGuire 10. Judicious Use of Neuropsychiatric Evidence When Sentencing Offenders With Addictive Behaviors: Implications for Neurointerventions Andrew Dawson, Jennifer Chandler, Colin Gavaghan, Wayne Hall, and Adrian Carter PART III. HEALING PEOPLE 11. "It Will Help You Repent": Why the Communicative Theory of Punishment Requires the Provision of Medications to Offenders With ADHD William Bülow 12. Is It Really Ethical to Prescribe Antiandrogens to Sex Offenders to Decrease Their Risk of Recidivism? Christopher James Ryan 13. Chemical Castration as Punishment Katrina L. Sifferd 14. Foundational Facts for Legal Responsibility: Human Agency and the Aims of Restorative Neurointerventions Paul Sheldon Davies PART IV. CHANGING PEOPLE 15. Make Me Gay: What Neurointerventions Tell Us About Sexual Orientation and Why It Matters for the Law Andrew Vierra PART V. ENHANCING PEOPLE 16. Neuroenhancement, Coercion, and Neo- Luddism Alexandre Erler 17. Neurointerventions and Business Law: On the Legal and Moral Issues of Neurotechnology in Business and How They Differ From the Criminal Law Context Patrick D. Hopkins and Harvey L. Fiser Index

"A wave of new and proposed technologies to alter the brain have enlivened debate about when interventions should be considered morally and legally permissible. The editors have assembled a top-notch group of international contributors with the philosophical and scientific knowledge to make real progress. The contributions are wide-ranging, insightful, and rigorous and should be read by scholars, students, and thoughtful laypeople interested in how new technologies are shaping and will continue to shape law, medicine, and society more generally." -Adam Kolber, Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School "This timely cutting-edge collection vividly demonstrates why neurolaw's transdisciplinary lens is required to address current and emerging pressing questions regarding the justification of legal systems, their laws, and practices. Whether those questions concern the bases of moral (and legal) responsibility, the defensible deployment of neurointerventions, or the legal regulation of their use, careful engagement with neuroscience and psychology is essential. The contributors to this collection take up this task, expertly synthesizing science, philosophy, and legal scholarship. An essential read for anyone wishing to stay abreast of developments in this fast-paced, sophisticated, and important flourishing field." -Hannah Maslen, Deputy Director, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford; Editor-in-Chief, Neuroethics

Selling point: Features original chapters on a wide variety of issues that relate to neurointerventions in the legal domain Selling point: Presents discussions of a large range of neurointerventions-e.g., pharmacological interventions vs. brain implants Selling point: Contains an exclusive introduction that details different kinds of neurointerventions and how they relate to more traditional forms of non-neural interventions

Nicole A Vincent, PhD is a Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Transdisciplinary Innovation at University of Technology Sydney. She is also an Honorary Fellow in the Department of Philosophy at Macquarie University, and an Affiliate Member of its Centre for Agency, Values, and Ethics. She has published widely in neuroethics, neurolaw, philosophy of tort and criminal law, ethics, and political philosophy. Her current work also engages with topics in the philosophy and ethics of emerging technologies, futures, feminism, and gender studies. Thomas Nadelhoffer, PhD is an Associate Professor in the Philosophy Department at the College of Charleston, an affiliate member of the psychology department, and a roster faculty member in the neuroscience program. He has edited The Future of Punishment (Oxford University Press 2013) and co-edited Moral Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Readings (Wiley-Blackwell 2010). He has also published widely on topics ranging from action theory, free will, moral psychology, neuroethics, criminal law, psychopathology, and punishment. Allan McCay, PhD teaches at the University of Sydney Foundation Program, and is a member of the Management Committee of the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney Law School. He is also an Affiliate Member of the Centre for Agency, Values, and Ethics at Macquarie University. His research interests include neurolaw, free will and punishment, and legal and ethical issues related to emerging technologies. He co-edited Free Will and the Law: New Perspectives with Michael Sevel (Routledge 2019).

Selling point: Features original chapters on a wide variety of issues that relate to neurointerventions in the legal domain Selling point: Presents discussions of a large range of neurointerventions-e.g., pharmacological interventions vs. brain implants Selling point: Contains an exclusive introduction that details different kinds of neurointerventions and how they relate to more traditional forms of non-neural interventions