<i>‘We were very pleased to learn of this ambitious new two-volume compendium of key contributions over the last twenty years or so to the field of input–output analysis, compiled by seasoned veteran input-output researchers Erik Dietzenbacher, Michael Lahr and Manfred Lenzen. The input-output field is experiencing a notable renaissance of methodological developments and applications, especially in conjunction with the growing collection of global data sets, to evaluate economic, environmental, and social policy issues. These recent developments are captured very effectively in the collection, which draws on a wide range of both traditional and newer, specialized journals with which some readers may be less familiar. The new compendium stands as an excellent resource on its own, and it will also serve as an especially useful companion to existing texts in the field.’</i>

- Peter Blair, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine and Ronald E. Miller, University of Pennsylvania, US,

The international fragmentation of current production processes has led to an explosion of trade in intermediate products, indirectly impacting jobs, income, resources, energy, and emissions. Much of what is consumed is produced via global value chains contributing to climate change via carbon dioxide emissions. The editors comprehensively present research that has advanced the state of the art in input-output analysis over the past two decades, along with an original introduction. Also provided is analysis of the complex interdependent international production structures and their links to social inequality and the environment, which has led to a demand for international input-output tables.
Les mer
Contents: Volume I Introduction: Introducing the Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis Erik Dietzenbacher, Michael L. Lahr and Manfred Lenzen xiv PART I DATA: INPUT–OUTPUT GOING GLOBAL 1. Jan A. van der Linden and Jan Oosterhaven (1995), ‘European Community Intercountry Input–Output Relations: Construction Method and Main Results for 1965–85’, Economic Systems Research, 7 (3), 249–69 2 2. Bo Meng, Yaxiong Zhang and Satoshi Inomata (2013), ‘Compilation and Applications of IDE-JETRO’s International Input–Output Tables’, Economic Systems Research, 25 (1), March, 122–42 23 3. Erik Dietzenbacher, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, Marcel Timmer and Gaaitzen de Vries (2013), ‘The Construction of World Input–Output Tables in the WIOD Project’, Economic Systems Research, 25 (1), March, 71–98 44 4. Arnold Tukker, Evgueni Poliakov, Reinout Heijungs, Troy Hawkins, Frederik Neuwahl, José M. Rueda-Cantuche, Stefan Giljum, Stephan Moll, Jan Oosterhaven and Maaike Bouwmeester (2009), ‘Towards a Global Multi-Regional Environmentally Extended Input–Output Database’, Ecological Economics, 68 (7), May, 1928–37 72 5. Manfred Lenzen, Keiichiro Kanemoto, Daniel Moran and Arne Geschke (2012), ‘Mapping the Structure of the World Economy’, Environmental Science and Technology, 46 (15), 8374–81 82 6. Martin Bruckner, Stefan Giljum, Christian Lutz and Kirsten Svenja Wiebe (2012), ‘Materials Embodied in International Trade – Global Material Extraction and Consumption between 1995 and 2005’, Global Environmental Change, 22 (3), August, 568–76 90 7. Glen P. Peters, Robbie Andrew and James Lennox (2011), ‘Constructing an Environmentally-Extended Multi-Regional Input– Output Table Using the GTAP Database’, Economic Systems Research, 23 (2), June, 131–52 99 PART II TRADE 8. Faye Duchin (2005), ‘A World Trade Model Based on Comparative Advantage with m Regions, n Goods, and k Factors’, Economic Systems Research, 17 (2), June, 141–62 122 vi Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis I 9. David Hummels, Jun Ishii and Kei-Mu Yi (2001), ‘The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 54 (1), June, 75–96 144 10. Robert Koopman, Zhi Wang and Shang-Jin Wei (2014), ‘Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports’, American Economic Review, 104 (2), February, 459–94 166 11. Robert C. Johnson and Guillermo Noguera (2012), ‘Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added’, Journal of International Economics, 86 (2), March, 224–36 202 12. Bart Los, Marcel P. Timmer and Gaaitzen J. de Vries (2015), ‘How Global are Global Value Chains? A New Approach to Measure International Fragmentation’, Journal of Regional Science, Special Issue: Local Consequences of Global Production Processes, 55 (1), January, 66–92 215 13. Jeffrey J. Reimer (2006), ‘Global Production Sharing and Trade in the Services of Factors’, Journal of International Economics, 68 (2), March, 384–408 242 14. Daniel Trefler and Susan Chun Zhu (2010), ‘The Structure of Factor Content Predictions’, Journal of International Economics, 82 (2), November, 195–207 267 15. Erik Dietzenbacher and Isidoro Romero (2007), ‘Production Chains in an Interregional Framework: Identification by Means of Average Propagation Lengths’, International Regional Science Review, 30 (4), October, 362–83 280 16. Pol Antràs, Davin Chor, Thibault Fally and Russell Hillberry (2012), ‘Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows’, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 102 (3), May, 412–16 302 PART III STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS 17. Erik Dietzenbacher and Bart Los (1998), ‘Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity’, Economic Systems Research, 10 (4), December, 307–23 308 18. Mark De Haan (2001), ‘A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Pollution in the Netherlands’, Economic Systems Research, 13 (2), June, 181–96 325 19. Jan Oosterhaven and Alex R. Hoen (1998), ‘Preferences, Technology, Trade and Real Income Changes in the European Union: An Intercountry Decomposition Analysis for 1975–1985’, Annals of Regional Science, 32 (4), November, 505–24 341 20. Yan Xia, Ying Fan and Cuihong Yang (2015), ‘Assessing the Impact of Foreign Content in China’s Exports on the Carbon Outsourcing Hypothesis’, Applied Energy, 150, July, 296–307 361 Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis I vii 21. Xuemei Jiang, Erik Dietzenbacher and Bart Los (2014), ‘A Dissection of the Growth of Regional Disparities in Chinese Labor Productivity between 1997 and 2002’, Annals of Regional Science, 52 (2), March, 513–36 373 PART IV STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND PRODUCTIVITY 22. Thijs ten Raa and Edward N. Wolff (2001), ‘Outsourcing of Services and the Productivity Recovery in U.S. Manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16 (2), September, 149–65 398 23. Antonio F. Amores and Thijs ten Raa (2014), ‘Firm Efficiency, Industry Performance and the Economy: Three-Way Decomposition with an Application to Andalusia’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42 (1), August, 25–34 415 24. Masahiro Kuroda and Koji Nomura (2004), ‘Technological Change and Accumulated Capital: A Dynamic Decomposition of Japan’s Growth’, in Erik Dietzenbacher and Michael L. Lahr (eds), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics, Chapter 15, Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 256–93 425 25. Yasuhide Okuyama, Michael Sonis and Geoffrey J.D. Hewings (2006), ‘Typology of Structural Change in a Regional Economy: A Temporal Inverse Analysis’, Economic Systems Research, 18 (2), June, 133–53 463 26. Philip R. Israilevich, Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Michael Sonis and Graham R. Schindler (1997), ‘Forecasting Structural Change with a Regional Econometric Input– Output Model’, Journal of Regional Science, 37 (4), November, 565–90 484 PART V HYPOTHETICAL EXTRACTIONS 27. Ronald E. Miller and Michael L. Lahr (2001), ‘A Taxonomy of Extractions’, in Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis: A Festschrift in Memory of Benjamin H. Stevens, Chapter 21, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 407–41 511 28. Yu Song, Chunlu Liu and Craig Langston (2006), ‘Linkage Measures of the Construction Sector Using the Hypothetical Extraction Method’, Construction Management and Economics, 24 (6), 579–89 546 29. Carsten A. Holz (2011), ‘The Unbalanced Growth Hypothesis and the Role of the State: The Case of China’s State-Owned Enterprises’, Journal of Development Economics, 96 (2), November, 220–38 557 30. Erik Dietzenbacher and Michael L. Lahr (2013), ‘Expanding Extractions’, Economic Systems Research, 25 (3), September, 341–60 576 viii Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis I PART VI UPDATING AND PROJECTIONS 31. Wenfeng Huang, Shintaro Kobayashi and Hajime Tanji (2008), ‘Updating an Input–Output Matrix with Sign-Preservation: Some Improved Objective Functions and their Solutions’, Economic Systems Research, 20 (1), March, 111–23 597 32. Umed Temurshoev and Marcel P. Timmer (2011), ‘Joint Estimation of Supply and Use Tables’, Papers in Regional Science, 90 (4), November, 863–82 610 33. Sherman Robinson, Andrea Cattaneo and Moataz El-Said (2001), ‘Updating and Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods’, Economic Systems Research, 13 (1), March, 47–64 630 34. Manfred Lenzen, Maria Cecilia Pinto de Moura, Arne Geschke, Keiichiro Kanemoto and Daniel Dean Moran (2012), ‘A Cycling Method for Constructing Input–Output Table Time Series from Incomplete Data’, Economic Systems Research, 24 (4), December, 413–32 648 PART VII DISASTERS 35. Adam Rose, Juan Benavides, Stephanie E. Chang, Philip Szczesniak and Dongsoon Lim (1997), ‘The Regional Economic Impact of an Earthquake: Direct and Indirect Effects of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions’, Journal of Regional Science, 37 (3), August, 437–58 669 36. Joost R. Santos and Yacov Y. Haimes (2004), ‘Modeling the Demand Reduction Input–Output (I–O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures’, Risk Analysis, 24 (6), December, 1437–51 691 37. Sungbin Cho, Peter Gordon, James E. Moore II, Harry W. Richardson, Masanobu Shinozuka and Stephanie Chang (2001), ‘Integrating Transportation Network and Regional Economic Models to Estimate the Costs of a Large Urban Earthquake’, Journal of Regional Science, 41 (1), February, 39–65 706 38. Yasuhide Okuyama (2004), ‘Modeling Spatial Economic Impacts of an Earthquake: Input–Output Approaches’, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13 (4), 297–306 733 PART VIII DATA: OTHER NEW INITIATIVES 39. Tomohiro Okadera, Masataka Watanabe and Kaiqin Xu (2006), ‘Analysis of Water Demand and Water Pollutant Discharge Using a Regional Input–Output Table: An Application to the City of Chongqing, Upstream of the Three Gorges Dam in China’, Ecological Economics, 58 (2), June, 221–37 744 Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis I ix 40. Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, Yasuhide Okuyama and Michael Sonis (2001), ‘Economic Interdependence within the Chicago Metropolitan Area: A Miyazawa Analysis’, Journal of Regional Science, 41 (2), May, 195–217 761 41. Xiannuan Lin and Karen R. Polenske (1998), ‘Input–Output Modeling of Production Processes for Business Management’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 9 (2), June, 205–26 784 42. Vito Albino, Carmen Izzo and Silvana Kühtz (2002), ‘Input– Output Models for the Analysis of a Local/Global Supply Chain’, International Journal of Production Economics, 78 (2), July, 119–31 806 43. Xikang Chen, Leonard K. Cheng, K. C. Fung, Lawrence J. Lau, Yun-Wing Sung, K. Zhu, C. Yang, J. Pei and Y. Duan (2012), ‘Domestic Value Added and Employment Generated by Chinese Exports: A Quantitative Estimation’, China Economic Review, 23 (4), December, 850–64 819 44. Robert Koopman, Zhi Wang and Shang-Jin Wei (2012), ‘Estimating Domestic Content in Exports when Processing Trade is Pervasive’, Journal of Development Economics, 99 (1), September, 178–89 834 45. Chris Bachmann, Matthew J. Roorda and Chris Kennedy (2015), ‘Developing a Multi-Scale Multi-Region Input–Output Model’, Economic Systems Research, 27 (2), June, 172–93 846 46. Manfred Lenzen, Arne Geschke, Thomas Wiedmann, Joe Lane, Neal Anderson, Timothy Baynes, John Boland, Peter Daniels, Christopher Dey, Jacob Fry, Michalis Hadjikakou, Steven Kenway, Arunima Malik, Daniel Moran, Joy Murray, Stuart Nettleton, Lavinia Poruschi, Christian Reynolds, Hazel Rowley, Julien Ugon, Dean Webb and James West (2014), ‘Compiling and Using Input– Output Frameworks through Collaborative Virtual Laboratories’, Science of the Total Environment, 485–486, July, 241–51 868 47. G. Papaconstantinou, N. Sakurai and A. Wyckoff (1998), ‘Domestic and International Product-Embodied R&D Diffusion’, Research Policy, 27 (3), July, 301–14 879 Volume II Introduction An introduction to both volumes by the editors appears in Volume I PART I INTRODUCTION 1. Faye Duchin (1992), ‘Industrial Input–Output Analysis: Implications for Industrial Ecology’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 89 (3), February, 851–55 2 2. Sangwon Suh and Shigemi Kagawa (2005), ‘Industrial Ecology and Input–Output Economics: An Introduction’, Economic Systems Research, 17 (4), December, 349–64 7 3. Edgar G. Hertwich (2005), ‘Consumption and Industrial Ecology’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (1–2), January, 1–6 23 4. Rutger Hoekstra and Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh (2006), ‘Constructing Physical Input–Output Tables for Environmental Modeling and Accounting: Framework and Illustrations’, Ecological Economics, 59 (3), September, 375–93 29 PART II HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 5. Walter Isard, Kenneth Bassett, Charles Choguill, John Furtado, Ronald Izumita, John Kissin, Eliahu Romanoff, Richard Seyfarth and Richard Tatlock (1968), ‘On the Linkage of Socio-Economic and Ecologic Systems’, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 21 (1), December, 79–99 49 6. Herman E. Daly (1968), ‘On Economics as a Life Science’, Journal of Political Economy, 76 (3), May–June, 392–406 70 7. Robert U. Ayres and Allen V. Kneese (1969), ‘Production, Consumption, and Externalities’, American Economic Review, 59 (3), June, 282–97 85 8. Wassily Leontief and Daniel Ford (1972), ‘Air Pollution and the Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input–Output Computations’, in A. Brody and A.P. Carter (eds), Input–Output Techniques, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co./American Elsevier, 9–30 101 9. Bruce Hannon (1973), ‘The Structure of Ecosystems’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 41 (3), October, 535–46 123 10. Werner Antweiler (1996), ‘The Pollution Terms of Trade’, Economic Systems Research, 8 (4), December, 361–65 135 vi Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis II 11. Steven J. Keuning, Jan van Dalen and Mark de Haan (1999), ‘The Netherlands’ NAMEA: Presentation, Usage and Future Extensions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10 (1), January, 15–37 140 12. Mònica Serrano and Erik Dietzenbacher (2010), ‘Responsibility and Trade Emission Balances: An Evaluation of Approaches’, Ecological Economics, 69 (11), September, 2224–32 163 PART III RESOURCES AND ENERGY 13. Graham J. Treloar (1997), ‘Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-Based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method’, Economic Systems Research, 9 (4), December, 375–91 173 14. Klaus Hubacek and Stefan Giljum (2003), ‘Applying Physical Input–Output Analysis to Estimate Land Appropriation (Ecological Footprints) of International Trade Activities’, Ecological Economics, 44 (1), February, 137–51 190 15. Kuishuang Feng, Ashok Chapagain, Sangwon Suh, Stephan Pfister and Klaus Hubacek (2011), ‘Comparison of Bottom-Up and Top- Down Approaches to Calculating the Water Footprints of Nations’, Economic Systems Research: Input–Output and Water, 23 (4), December, 371–85 205 16. Thomas O. Wiedmann, Heinz Schandl, Manfred Lenzen, Daniel Moran, Sangwon Suh, James West and Keiichiro Kanemoto (2015), ‘The Material Footprint of Nations’, PNAS – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112 (20), 19th May, 6271–76 220 17. Manfred Lenzen, Daniel Moran, Anik Bhaduri, Keiichiro Kanemoto, Maksud Bekchanov, Arne Geschke, Barney Foran (2013), ‘International Trade of Scarce Water’, Ecological Economics, 94, October, 78–85 226 18. Jun Lan, Arunima Malik, Manfred Lenzen, Darian McBain and Keiichiro Kanemoto (2016), ‘A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global Energy Footprints’, Applied Energy, 163 (1), February, 436–51 234 PART IV CLIMATE CHANGE 19. Jesper Munksgaard and Klaus Alsted Pedersen (2001), ‘CO2 Accounts for Open Economies: Producer or Consumer Responsibility?’, Energy Policy, 29 (4), March, 327–34 251 Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis II vii 20. J.C. Minx, T. Wiedmann, R. Wood, G.P. Peters, M. Lenzen, A. Owen, K. Scott, J. Barrett, K. Hubacek, G. Baiocchi, A. Paul, E. Dawkins, J. Briggs, D. Guan, S. Suh and F. Ackerman (2009), ‘Input–Output Analysis and Carbon Footprinting: An Overview of Applications’, Economic Systems Research: Carbon Footprint and Input–Output Analysis, 21 (3), September, 187–216 259 21. Thomas Wiedmann, Richard Wood, Jan C. Minx, Manfred Lenzen, Dabo Guan and Rocky Harris (2010), ‘A Carbon Footprint Time Series of the UK – Results from a Multi-Region Input–Output Model’, Economic Systems Research, 22 (1), March, 19–42 289 22. Steven J. Davis and Ken Caldeira (2010), ‘Consumption-Based Accounting of CO2 Emissions’, PNAS – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107 (12), 23rd March, 5687–92 313 23. Glen P. Peters, Jan C. Minx, Christopher L. Weber and Ottmar Edenhofer (2011), ‘Growth in Emission Transfers via International Trade from 1990 to 2008’, PNAS – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 108 (21), 24th May, 8903–8 319 24. Kuishuang Feng, Steven J. Davis, Laixiang Sun, Xin Li, Dabo Guan, Weidong Liu, Zhu Liu and Klaus Hubacek (2013), ‘Outsourcing CO2 within China’, PNAS – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 110 (28), 9th July, 11654–59 325 PART V OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS AND ECOSYSTEMS 25. Shinichiro Nakamura and Yasushi Kondo (2002), ‘Input–Output Analysis of Waste Management’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6 (1), January, 39–63 332 26. Sangwon Suh (2005), ‘Theory of Materials and Energy Flow Analysis in Ecology and Economics’, Ecological Modelling, 189 (3–4), December, 251–69 357 27. Azusa Oita, Arunima Malik, Keiichiro Kanemoto, Arne Geschke, Shota Nishijima and Manfred Lenzen (2016), ‘Substantial Nitrogen Pollution Embedded in International Trade’, Nature Geoscience, 9 (2), February, 111–15 376 28. Mulin Hui, Qingru Wu, Shuxiao Wang, Sai Liang, Lei Zhang, Fengyang Wang, Manfred Lenzen, Yafei Wang, Lixiao Xu, Zhongtian Lin, Hai Yang, Yan Lin, Thorjorn Larssen, Ming Xu and Jiming Hao (2017), ‘Mercury Flows in China and Global Drivers’, Environmental Science and Technology, 51 (1), January, 222–31 381 PART VI SUB-NATIONAL IO STUDIES 29. Dabo Guan and Klaus Hubacek (2007), ‘Assessment of Regional Trade and Virtual Water Flows in China’, Ecological Economics, 61 (1), February, 159–70 392 viii Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis II 30. Erik Dietzenbacher and Esther Velázquez (2007), ‘Analysing Andalusian Virtual Water Trade in an Input– Output Framework’, Regional Studies, 41 (2), 185–96 404 31. Yang Yu, Klaus Hubacek, Kuishuang Feng and Dabo Guan (2010), ‘Assessing Regional and Global Water Footprints for the UK’, Ecological Economics, 69 (5), March, 1140–47 416 32. Manfred Lenzen and Greg M. Peters (2010), ‘How City Dwellers Affect Their Resource Hinterland: A Spatial Impact Study of Australian Households’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Special Issue: Sustainable Consumption and Production, 14 (1), January– February, 73–90 424 33. Jan Minx, Giovanni Baiocchi, Thomas Wiedmann, John Barrett, Felix Creutzig, Kuishuang Feng, Michael Förster, Peter-Paul Pichler, Helga Weisz and Klaus Hubacek (2013), ‘Carbon Footprints of Cities and Other Human Settlements in the UK’, Environmental Research Letters, 8 (035039), September, 1–10 442 34. Ryoji Hasegawa, Shigemi Kagawa and Makiko Tsukui (2015), ‘Carbon Footprint Analysis through Constructing a Multi-Region Input–Output Table: A Case Study of Japan’, Journal of Economic Structures, 4 (5), December, 1–20 452 35. Makiko Tsukui, Shigemi Kagawa and Yasushi Kondo (2015), ‘Measuring the Waste Footprint of Cities in Japan: A Interregional Waste Input–Output Analysis’, Journal of Economic Structures, 4 (18), December, 1–24 472 PART VII IO-BASED LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT 36. Satish Joshi (1999), ‘Product Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment Using Input–Output Techniques’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3 (2–3), April, 95–120 497 37. H. Scott Matthews and Mitchell J. Small (2000), ‘Extending the Boundaries of Life-Cycle Assessment through Environmental Economic Input–Output Models’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4 (3), July, 7–10 523 38. Sangwon Suh, Manfred Lenzen, Graham J. Treloar, Hiroki Hondo, Arpad Horvath, Gjalt Huppes, Olivier Jolliet, Uwe Klann, Wolfram Krewitt, Yuichi Moriguchi, Jesper Munksgaard and Gregory Norris (2004), ‘System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches’, Environmental Science and Technology, 38 (3), February, 657–64 527 39. Sangwon Suh and Shinichiro Nakamura (2007), ‘Five Years in the Area of Input–Output and Hybrid LCA’, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12 (6), September, 351–52 535 Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis II ix 40. Edgar G. Hertwich (2011), ‘The Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Consumption’, Economic Systems Research, 23 (1), March, 27–47 537 41. Shigemi Kagawa, Klaus Hubacek, Keisuke Nansai, Minori Kataoka, Shunsuke Managi, Sangwon Suh and Yuki Kudoh (2013), ‘Better Cars or Older Cars?: Assessing CO2 Emission Reduction Potential of Passenger Vehicle Replacement Programs’, Global Environmental Change, 23 (6), December, 1807–18 558 PART VIII TEMPORAL AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 42. Iñaki Arto and Erik Dietzenbacher (2014), ‘Drivers of the Growth in Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, Environmental Science and Technology, 48 (10), May, 5388–94 571 43. Dabo Guan, Glen P. Peters, Christopher L. Weber and Klaus Hubacek (2009), ‘Journey to World Top Emitter: An Analysis of the Driving Forces of China’s Recent CO2 Emissions Surge’, Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (4), February, 1–5 578 44. Haiyan Zhang and Michael L. Lahr (2014), ‘China’s Energy Consumption Change from 1987 to 2007: A Multi-Regional Structural Decomposition Analysis’, Energy Policy, 67, April, 682–93 583 45. Jan Weinzettel and Jan Kovanda (2011), ‘Structural Decomposition Analysis of Raw Material Consumption: The Case of the Czech Republic’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15 (6), December, 893–907 595 46. Arnold Tukker, Tanya Bulavskaya, Stefan Giljum, Arjan de Koning, Stephan Lutter, Moana Simas, Konstantin Stadler and Richard Wood (2016), ‘Environmental and Resource Footprints in a Global Context: Europe’s Structural Deficit in Resource Endowments’, Global Environmental Change, 40, September, 171–81 610 47. Manfred Lenzen (2007), ‘Structural Path Analysis of Ecosystem Networks’, Ecological Modelling, 200 (3–4), January, 334–42 621 48. Richard Wood and Manfred Lenzen (2009), ‘Structural Path Decomposition’, Energy Economics, 31 (3), May, 335–41 630 PART IX ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE POLICY 49. Erik Dietzenbacher and Kakali Mukhopadhyay (2007), ‘An Empirical Examination of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis for India: Towards a Green Leontief Paradox?’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 36 (4), April, 427–49 638 x Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis II 50. Glen P. Peters and Edgar G. Hertwich (2008), ‘Post-Kyoto Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Production versus Consumption’, Climatic Change, 86 (1–2), January, 51–66 661 51. Michael Jakob, Jan Christoph Steckel and Ottmar Edenhofer (2014), ‘Consumption- Versus Production-Based Emission Policies’, Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6, November, 297–318 677 52. John Barrett, Glen Peters, Thomas Wiedmann, Kate Scott, Manfred Lenzen, Katy Roelich and Corinne Le Quéré (2013), ‘Consumption- Based GHG Emission Accounting: A UK Case Study’, Climate Policy, 13 (4), 451–70 699 53. Haiyan Zhang, Michael L. Lahr and Jun Bi (2016), ‘Challenges of Green Consumption in China: A Household Energy Use Perspective’, Economic Systems Research, 28 (2), June, 183–201 719 54. Faye Duchin, Stephen H. Levine and Anders Hammer Strømman (2016), ‘Combining Multiregional Input–Output Analysis with a World Trade Model for Evaluating Scenarios for Sustainable Use of Global Resources, Part I: Conceptual Framework’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20 (4), August, 775–82 738 55. Arjan de Koning, Gjalt Huppes, Sebastiaan Deetman and Arnold Tukker (2016), ‘Scenarios for a 2 °C World: A Trade-Linked Input– Output Model with High Sector Detail’, Climate Policy, 16 (3), 301–17 746 PART X SOCIAL ASPECTS: RESPONSIBILITY AND FOOTPRINTS 56. Albert E. Steenge (1999), ‘Input–Output Theory and Institutional Aspects of Environmental Policy’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10 (1), January, 161–76 764 57. Roxana Juliá and Faye Duchin (2007), ‘World Trade as the Adjustment Mechanism of Agriculture to Climate Change’, Climatic Change, 82 (3–4), June, 393–409 780 58. Darian McBain and Ali Alsamawi (2014), ‘Quantitative Accounting for Social Economic Indicators’, Natural Resources Forum: Special Section on Oceans and Seas, 38 (3), August, 193–202 797 59. Ali Alsamawi, Joy Murray and Manfred Lenzen (2014), ‘The Employment Footprints of Nations: Uncovering Master–Servant Relationships’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18 (1), February, 59–70 807 60. Moana S. Simas, Laura Golsteijn, Mark A.J. Huijbregts, Richard Wood and Edgar G. Hertwich (2014), ‘The “Bad Labor” Footprint: Quantifying the Social Impacts of Globalization’, Sustainability, 6 (11), October, 7514–40 819 Recent Developments in Input–Output Analysis II xi 61. Daniel Moran, Darian McBain, Keiichiro Kanemoto, Manfred Lenzen and Arne Geschke (2015), ‘Global Supply Chains of Coltan: A Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Study Using a Social Indicator’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19 (3), June, 357–65 846 62. Alexandre Tisserant and Stefan Pauliuk (2016), ‘Matching Global Cobalt Demand under Different Scenarios for Co-Production and Mining Attractiveness’, Journal of Economic Structures, 5 (4), December, 1–19 855 63. Jorge Gómez-Paredes, Ali Alsamawi, Eiji Yamasue, Hideyuki Okumura, Keiichi N. Ishihara, Arne Geschke and Manfred Lenzen (2016), ‘Consuming Childhoods: An Assessment of Child Labor’s Role in Indian Production and Global Consumption’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Special Issue: Linking Local Consumption to Global Impacts, 20 (3), June, 611–22 874
Les mer

Produktdetaljer

ISBN
9781786430809
Publisert
2020-07-14
Utgiver
Vendor
Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd
Høyde
244 mm
Bredde
169 mm
Aldersnivå
P, 06
Språk
Product language
Engelsk
Format
Product format
Innbundet
Antall sider
1832

Biografisk notat

Edited by Erik Dietzenbacher, Professor of Interindustry Economics, University of Groningen, the Netherlands, Michael L. Lahr, Professor of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, US and Manfred Lenzen, Professor of Sustainability Research, University of Sydney, Australia